The text of the interview:
- Good afternoon, Sadyr Nurgoyevich! Yesterday, January 28, marked exactly five years since your inauguration as president. How has Kyrgyzstan changed during this time? The work carried out by you and your team is actively discussed in both domestic and foreign media, including in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.
During these discussions, it is emphasized that a number of problems that had been relevant for many years have been resolved, large-scale international projects have been launched, and relations with partners have significantly improved.
However, some media, while acknowledging these achievements, also point out shortcomings. In particular, there is an opinion that the situation with freedom of speech and human rights in Kyrgyzstan has worsened. How do you comment on these claims of an alleged rollback from democratic principles?
- Good afternoon. In our country, there are freedoms of speech and democratic principles. Compared to previous years, it can be said that freedom of speech has not diminished today. Citizens have the opportunity to express their opinions both on social media and in the media.
People openly discuss social and political issues, participate in discussions of government decisions, and express their personal problems. No one interferes or restricts them in this. Citizens freely share their opinions on any issues.
These opinions are actively discussed and disseminated. Of course, some may argue that law enforcement agencies detain certain individuals, which can be perceived as a violation of human rights. However, it should be remembered that freedom of speech also implies responsibility.
Detentions occur not for criticism or statements, but in cases where someone, under the guise of freedom of speech, attempts to destabilize the situation in the country or calls for a violation of constitutional order. We cannot simply turn a blind eye to this.
Detention is a serious measure, and law enforcement agencies act within the framework of the law, obtaining judicial sanctions and collecting evidence.
For example, last autumn, the public witnessed a conversation between a representative of a political party and a foreigner, where plans for organizing mass riots were discussed. This person was seeking funding and support. When the law is violated, such individuals may claim that they are journalists or bloggers. Let them engage in their activities, but we urge them not to use freedom of speech as a cover for illegal actions.
Some, citing freedom of speech, incite interregional hatred. When their statements divide the people along territorial lines, we cannot remain indifferent and simply watch.
Those who wish to hold protests should choose a park area, for example, Gorky Park, invite the media, and express their demands there. It is important not to interfere with the work of government bodies. This practice is common in various countries.
Often, when it comes to freedom of speech, examples from developed countries in Europe and America are cited. But what is actually happening in these countries? The U.S. immigration police shot two citizens on charges of disobedience. Trump sued the BBC for $5 billion.
As for Europe, in most countries, demonstrations are harshly suppressed, activists are arrested, and the rest are kept under control. This is reported by both local media and international research organizations. This is not necessarily bad. I believe that in modern conditions, the security of the state and its integrity come to the forefront.
I am convinced that this serves the interests of society as a whole, including those citizens who sometimes, succumbing to emotions, speak of a “lack of freedom of speech” and “democracy.”
Thus, as I have already mentioned, there are no restrictions on freedom of speech or human rights in Kyrgyzstan. Claims from certain websites that “freedom of speech does not exist” or “human rights are violated” are unfounded.
